The Roses debate got off to a fiery start, however ended amicably for all parties. As an unsuspecting audience we found it to be more eccentric than expected, with arguments revolving around the two opposing University mascots.
First place was awarded to Opening Government, commended for their straightforward and easy evidence claims. Opening Opposition received second place for a great showing, though judges felt they could improve by emphasising scale of impact more. Closely followed by Closing Government in third place. Judges saw real promise in their idea, yet believed it could be more relevant to the main argument.
Regardless of the result, there was great sportsmanship on all fronts and a really lively atmosphere in the room. Speakers made both their teammates and their competitors laugh throughout their arguments making it a thoroughly enjoyable watch.
The competition was fierce, the atmosphere was tense. The debate concluded with judges highlighting strengths and weaknesses among a really strong class of debaters. Despite the intensity of the event, both teams ended on a high, bonding over their shared hatred of Manchester. We are already anticipating what they can come up with next year!